ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Decoding the heterogeneity of liver-resident macrophages in chronic liver diseases: therapeutic responses to immunomodulatory strategies.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bidirectional interplay between gut and liver in inflammatory bowel disease and hepatobiliary conditions.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- NAFLD-associated immune remodeling in colorectal cancer liver metastasis: mechanisms and implications for immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Gut-Liver Axis Failure in Critical Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease: From ICU Secondary Hits to Microbiome-Targeted Therapy.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic liver diseases (CLDs), encompassing a spectrum of etiologies including metabolic dysfunction, alcohol abuse, and viral infections, represent a significant global health burden. The progression of these diseases to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma is underpinned by complex immunological mechanisms in which liver-resident macrophages (LRMs) are central players. LRMs are not a monolithic population but a heterogeneous consortium of cells, primarily comprising embryonically-derived, self-renewing Kupffer cells and dynamically recruited monocyte-derived macrophages. These subsets, along with newly identified populations like lipid-associated macrophages and scar-associated macrophages, exhibit distinct origins, phenotypes, and functions that profoundly influence the trajectory of liver injury and repair. A new generation of immunomodulatory therapies is being developed to specifically target the pathways that govern LRM function. However, clinical responses to these agents have been variable, a phenomenon largely attributable to their differential effects on the diverse LRM subsets and the profound heterogeneity of the patient population. This review elucidates the complex heterogeneity of LRMs in the context of different CLDs. We dissect the mechanisms by which emerging immunomodulatory therapies-including PPAR agonists, chemokine receptor antagonists, and intracellular signaling inhibitors-alter the balance, phenotype, and functional output of distinct LRM populations. By integrating findings from preclinical models with outcomes from recent clinical trials, we illustrate how the specific modulation of LRM subsets correlates with therapeutic efficacy or failure. Furthermore, we discuss the critical role of LRMs in the progression to hepatocellular carcinoma and the implications for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. Finally, we outline the key challenges in translating these findings into clinical practice and highlight future research priorities, emphasizing the need for single-cell technologies, investigation of the gut-liver axis, and development of combination therapies. A deeper understanding of LRM biology is paramount to advancing a precision medicine approach, ultimately paving the way for more effective and personalized treatments for patients with CLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.