ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
ctDNA in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Critical Appraisal.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunotherapy Resistance in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: from Tumor Biology to Biomarker-Guided Strategies.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Targeted Therapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Current Advances and Challenges.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Multiscale predictive cellular modeling: integrating hypothesis grammars, digital twins, and multi-omics for In silico oncology and precision theranostics.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Pancreatic Cancer and Biliary Tract Cancers: Biology, Biomarkers, and Evolving Systemic Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Biomarker-driven immunotherapy and adoptive cell therapy in recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest malignancies due to late diagnosis and limited treatment options. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising, minimally invasive biomarker that could improve the clinical outcomes of patients with PDAC by enabling early disease detection, minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment, precise prognostication, and accurate treatment monitoring. CtDNA has prognostic as well as predictive value in both resectable and metastatic settings, with serial measurements enhancing risk stratification and recurrence prediction beyond CA19-9. However, despite the promise, the true potential of ctDNA has not yet been fulfilled in patients with PDAC. The current limitations include a low sensitivity of ctDNA assays in early stage PDAC, challenges in the assay interpretation due to the specific nature of ctDNA shedding in PDAC, inter-patient heterogeneity, and technical variability. As precision oncology advances, ctDNA will be a powerful tool for personalized care in PDAC, but rigorous validation of its use within specific clinical contexts is still needed before the true potential of ctDNA is realized for patients with PDAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.