ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
Understanding Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Within Canadian Radiation Oncology Training Programs: A National Survey of Residents and Fellows.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender disparities in academic radiation oncology research: A narrative review.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027Review
- The Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology - Underrepresented in Radiation Oncology Mentorship Program (CARO-UROMP).Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Article
- Diversity and Experiences of Radiation Oncologists in Canada: A Survey of Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, Disability, Race, Ethnicity, Religion, and Workplace Discrimination-A National Cross-Sectional Electronic Survey.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study characterizes the current representation of sociodemographic groups within Canadian radiation oncology training programs and trainees' lived experiences.
methodsA 59-item ethics-approved, bilingual survey assessed sociodemographics, training perceptions, mentorship, discrimination/harassment experienced, and open-ended questions. Electronic surveys were distributed to all Canadian radiation oncology residents/fellows. Descriptive statistics summarized survey responses. Categorical groups were compared using chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests. Thematic analysis was performed on open-ended responses.
resultsBetween July and December 2023, 98 of 177 (56%) trainees participated: 70% were residents, 52% identified as male, 62% as a racialized minority, and 10% as a sexual minority. Most respondents reported training program satisfaction (83%) and a respectful workplace culture (69%); however, discrimination during training was reported by 38%. Less than half (45%) felt comfortable reporting discrimination/harassment within their workplace. Women were more likely to feel under-represented in-training (46% vs. 13%,
conclusionsAlthough most Canadian radiation oncology trainees reported satisfaction and a respectful culture, key differences between groups were observed. Targeted strategies and stronger institutional policies to improve representation and reduce rates of discrimination/harassment are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.