ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2025
Chrononutrition in Gestational Diabetes: Toward Precision Timing in Maternal Care.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chrono-Nutrition in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Implications of Meal Timing and Nutrient Distribution for Glycemic Control.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Relationship between skipping breakfast and metabolic syndrome among adults aged 35-74 years: a cross-sectional study in Northwest China, 2018-2020.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a heterogeneous disorder that compromises maternal and offspring health. Conventional medical nutrition therapy focuses on nutrient composition and caloric targets but largely omits timing and individualized biology. This narrative review synthesizes mechanistic, epidemiologic and interventional evidence linking circadian biology and meal timing (chrononutrition) to maternal glycemic control. Observational cohorts associate late eating and breakfast skipping with worse glycemia, while pilot interventions and CGM-based studies indicate that front-loading carbohydrates, restricting evening carbohydrate, extending overnight fasting (≈10-12 h), and simple within-meal sequencing can reduce postprandial excursions and increase time-in-range. We propose a pragmatic, tiered clinical pathway in which routine second-trimester triage (50 g glucose challenge test and ultrasound abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness) identifies higher-risk women for short-term CGM phenotyping and prioritized chrononutrition counseling. Integrating phenotype-matched timing interventions with dietetic support and digital decision tools allows rapid, individualized adjustments informed by real-time glucose patterns and patient chronotype. In principle, this tiered strategy could improve daily glycemic profiles, reduce the need for pharmacotherapy, and translate into better neonatal outcomes if supported by larger randomized trials. Chrononutrition therefore offers a promising extension of standard care: simple, low-cost adjustments to "when" food is eaten, supported by digital tools, could allow nutrition therapy for GDM to become more precise, more responsive, and ultimately more effective for both mother and child. Key priorities include validating bedside and chrono-omic stratifiers, testing scalable delivery platforms, and ensuring equitable access to personalized chrononutrition in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.