ReviewNeurology international2025
Neuromodulatory Effects of Transcranial Pulse Stimulation (TPS) in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prefrontal Transcranial Pulse Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTranscranial pulse stimulation (TPS) is an innovative non-invasive brain stimulation technique using ultrasonic waves. Despite its application in first clinical trials, so far, no systematic overview of its effects across different patient populations has been conducted.
objectivesThis systematic review and meta-analysis examines the effects of TPS on cognitive, motor, and mental health outcomes as well as on patient safety in neurological and psychiatric disorders.
methodsWe conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, PsycINFO & PsycArticles, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering the period from January 2013 to December 2024. Two independent reviewers conducted the study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. To evaluate the risk of bias, the RoB2 tool was used for randomized studies and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies.
resultsA total of fifteen studies (five randomized controlled trials and ten non-blinded, single-arm trials) including both adolescent and adult and elderly patient populations (Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, Parkinson's disease, major depressive disorder, autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder) were included. Positive effects of TPS intervention on cognitive, motor, and mental health outcomes, as well as a high safety profile, were demonstrated in a majority of the studies and outcome parameters. However, limitations of the included studies persist due to small sample sizes, lack of control groups, retrospective analyses, and heterogeneity of study protocols and measurements.
conclusionsTPS is a safe and promising method for treating neurological and psychiatric disorders. To better assess the potential of this innovative technique, standardized protocol procedures and larger, sham-controlled trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.