Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
A probiotic containing L. plantarum and P. acidilactici strains for treating upper respiratory infection in children aged 6 months to 5 years: a randomized, double-blind trial.
Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper respiratory infections (URIs) are highly prevalent, especially among young children. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of a specific probiotic formula in shortening the duration of pediatric URIs of likely viral origin. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in children aged 6 months to 5 years, with URI with pharyngitis as diagnosed by a specialist. Participants were allocated to probiotic (strains L. plantarum KABP022, KABP023, and KABP033 and P. acidilactici KABP021) or placebo, twice daily for 15 days, and further followed up at 30 and 60 days from baseline. Antipyretic (ibuprofen) and antihistamine (cetirizine) were allowed as comedication and controlled. Co-primary outcomes were days of fever (axillary temperature > 37.5 °C) and days of pain/discomfort (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability [FLACC] score > 3), as recorded in a diary. Causative viruses were identified by PCR in nasopharyngeal swabs. Seventy-five children were randomized and included in the analysis. The most frequent causative agents were rhinoviruses, coronaviruses, and respiratory syncytial virus. Compared to placebo, the durations of fever and of pain/discomfort were reduced by 1.1 days (95% CI 0.5-1.7; p = 0.001) and by 0.7 days (95% CI 0.2-1.2; p = 0.006) in the probiotic group, respectively. Sensitivity analyses by detected virus, age, sex, and recent URI episodes produced similar results. The use of comedication and other symptoms did not differ between study groups. No significant differences were found in the number of adverse events between the groups.
conclusionIntervention with this probiotic formula was associated with a shorter duration of fever and pain/discomfort in pediatric URIs with pharyngitis.
trial registrationProspectively registered on Oct 5 WHAT IS KNOWN: • Acute upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) are highly prevalent in children, but due to their frequent viral etiology, treatment is often symptomatic only. Some probiotics have shown promising results against URIs, but evidence mostly relies on untrained, subjective diagnosis by participants or their parents. Recently, a probiotic formula containing strains L. plantarum KABP022, KABP023, and KABP033 and P. acidilactici KABP021 reduced viral load and duration of symptoms in a randomized trial in 300 adults with laboratory-confirmed Covid19, against placebo. WHAT IS NEW: • In children with URI with pharyngitis, as diagnosed by a specialist, intervention with said probiotic formula reduced the duration both of fever and of pain/discomfort, compared to placebo. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses by age, sex, number of recent URIs, and by most prevalent causative viruses in the study population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.