ArticleJournal of medical systems2025
Automated Bone Age Assessment and Adult Height Prediction from Pediatric Hand Radiographs via a Cascaded Deep Learning Framework.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone age assessment: comparative analysis of Greulich-Pyle and Tanner-Whitehouse 3 by pediatric radiologists and endocrinologists.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone age assessment and adult height prediction are essential for evaluating pediatric growth. Traditional methods rely on manual radiographic interpretation, which is subjective, time-consuming, and prone to inter-observer variability. This study presents an automated approach using a cascaded deep learning model to assess bone age and predict adult height from pediatric hand radiographs, aiming to improve diagnostic objectivity and efficiency. A total of 8,242 left-hand radiographs from Chinese children were retrospectively collected. Bone age was annotated by experienced pediatric endocrinologists using the China-05 standard. The model employed Yolact for instance segmentation to detect and classify bone structures, followed by parallel ResNet-18 subnetworks to grade ossification centers in the radius, ulna, and metacarpal/phalangeal bones. Predicted grades were integrated using a standardized scoring system to estimate bone age. A regression model then predicted adult height based on these features. The model achieved a Pearson correlation of 0.98 ([Formula: see text]) for bone age and 0.94 ([Formula: see text]) for adult height predictions. Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal bias and narrow limits of agreement. Mean absolute errors were 0.25 years for bone age and 1.75 cm for adult height. Average inference time was 7.8 seconds, significantly enhancing clinical efficiency. The proposed cascaded deep learning model delivers accurate, efficient, and reliable bone age assessment and adult height prediction, offering strong potential for clinical integration in pediatric growth evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.