SynthesisAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2026
Real-World Evidence of Effectiveness and Safety of Abrocitinib, Baricitinib and Upadacitinib in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- JAK Inhibitor Safety in Atopic Dermatitis and Alopecia Areata: A 4.5-Year Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Real-World Evidence of Effectiveness and Safety of Abrocitinib, Baricitinib and Upadacitinib in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Long-Term Disease Control During Continuous Treatment with Upadacitinib and Baricitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: a Real-World Monocentric Retrospective Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Update on biologic and small molecules treatments in pediatric allergic diseases.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Review
- Dermatologic Toxicities Induced by JAK Inhibitors.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Skin Lipid Dysregulation in Atopic Dermatitis and Related Inflammatory Skin Diseases.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2026Review
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib Versus Abrocitinib in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Palmoplantar Pustulosis, Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, and Palmoplantar Pustular Psoriasis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Abrocitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-World, Retrospective Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Immunosenescence and Allergy: Molecular and Cellular Links Between Inflammaging, Neuro-Immune Aging, and Response to Biologic Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of 200 mg abrocitinib initiation in Chinese adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a retrospective study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have proven effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in multiple clinical trials, providing rapid response, deep efficacy when given at the highest formulated dose, and in the case of abrocitinib and upadacitinib, superiority to biologics treatments in the first 4-16 weeks. However, it is unclear how this translates to real-world efficacy and safety.
objectivesTo assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib in the treatment of AD.
methodsPubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched from inception until 3 January 2025 for observational studies investigating effectiveness and safety of abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib for the treatment of AD. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) following treatment with abrocitinib, baricitinib or upadacitinib after 12 and 16 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving EASI-50, EASI-90 and the proportion of patients experiencing adverse events (AE). Tertiary outcomes included the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Peak-Pruritus Numerical rating scale (PP-NRS).
resultsA total of 63 studies including 517 patients treated with abrocitinib (50 mg [0.2%], 100 mg [50.9%], 200 mg [34.2%], mixed/unknown [14.7%]), 574 with baricitinib (2 mg [14.8%], 4 mg [71.9%], mixed/unknown [13.3%]) and 2779 with upadacitinib were included (15 mg [46.6%], 30 mg [33.3%], mixed/unknown [20.0%]). Most studies reported outcomes for doses combined. Across all doses, the proportion of patients achieving EASI-75 and -90 was 75% and 38% for abrocitinib, 51% and 24% for baricitinib and 83% and 55% for upadacitinib after 16 weeks, respectively. Acne and herpes simplex virus (HSV) were frequently reported across all doses of abrocitinib (21%, 2%), baricitinib (8%, 6%) and upadacitinib (15%, 6%), but patients treated with 100 mg abrocitinib and 30 mg upadacitinib reported the highest prevalence of acne and HSV, respectively. Few studies reported serious AEs across all treatments and doses.
conclusionsData from real-world studies of JAKis in AD show effectiveness and safety similar to clinical trials using the highest treatment doses. It is important to be aware of HSV and acne risk as these AEs are the most common reasons for discontinuation. Interpretation of results was complicated by the lack of studies reporting dosage information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41296263What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.