Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296263›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2026

Real-World Evidence of Effectiveness and Safety of Abrocitinib, Baricitinib and Upadacitinib in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Amalie Thorsti Møller Rønnstad, Daniel Isufi, Christopher G Bunick, Raj Chovatiya, Mia-Louise Nielsen, Farzad Alinaghi, Simon F Thomsen, Christian Vestergaard, Andreas Wollenberg, Alexander Egeberg and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Update on biologic and small molecules treatments in pediatric allergic diseases.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Review
  5. Dermatologic Toxicities Induced by JAK Inhibitors.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amalie Thorsti Møller Rønnstad *Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Daniel Isufi *Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christopher G BunickDepartment of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
Raj ChovatiyaChicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Mia-Louise NielsenDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Farzad AlinaghiDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Simon F ThomsenDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian VestergaardDepartment of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andreas WollenbergDeptartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Alexander EgebergDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacob P ThyssenDepartment of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nikolai LoftDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark. nikolai.nguyen.loft@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2950-3280

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have proven effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in multiple clinical trials, providing rapid response, deep efficacy when given at the highest formulated dose, and in the case of abrocitinib and upadacitinib, superiority to biologics treatments in the first 4-16 weeks. However, it is unclear how this translates to real-world efficacy and safety.

objectivesTo assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib in the treatment of AD.

methodsPubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched from inception until 3 January 2025 for observational studies investigating effectiveness and safety of abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib for the treatment of AD. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) following treatment with abrocitinib, baricitinib or upadacitinib after 12 and 16 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving EASI-50, EASI-90 and the proportion of patients experiencing adverse events (AE). Tertiary outcomes included the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Peak-Pruritus Numerical rating scale (PP-NRS).

resultsA total of 63 studies including 517 patients treated with abrocitinib (50 mg [0.2%], 100 mg [50.9%], 200 mg [34.2%], mixed/unknown [14.7%]), 574 with baricitinib (2 mg [14.8%], 4 mg [71.9%], mixed/unknown [13.3%]) and 2779 with upadacitinib were included (15 mg [46.6%], 30 mg [33.3%], mixed/unknown [20.0%]). Most studies reported outcomes for doses combined. Across all doses, the proportion of patients achieving EASI-75 and -90 was 75% and 38% for abrocitinib, 51% and 24% for baricitinib and 83% and 55% for upadacitinib after 16 weeks, respectively. Acne and herpes simplex virus (HSV) were frequently reported across all doses of abrocitinib (21%, 2%), baricitinib (8%, 6%) and upadacitinib (15%, 6%), but patients treated with 100 mg abrocitinib and 30 mg upadacitinib reported the highest prevalence of acne and HSV, respectively. Few studies reported serious AEs across all treatments and doses.

conclusionsData from real-world studies of JAKis in AD show effectiveness and safety similar to clinical trials using the highest treatment doses. It is important to be aware of HSV and acne risk as these AEs are the most common reasons for discontinuation. Interpretation of results was complicated by the lack of studies reporting dosage information.

Indexed as

AzetidinesDermatitis, AtopicHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingJanus Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesSulfonamidesHumansMacrocyclic CompoundsObservational Studies as TopicPurinesPyrazolesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeabrocitinibAzetidinesbaricitinibHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingJanus Kinase InhibitorsMacrocyclic CompoundsPurinesPyrazolesPyrimidinesSulfonamidesupadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID41296263

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.