ArticlePloS one2025
Machine learning meets maternal health: Uncovering spatial blind spots in antenatal care quality in Bangladesh.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Infant and young child feeding in rural Bangladesh: insights into knowledge, practices, and associated factors.Journal of nutritional science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-quality antenatal care (ANC) is defined as four or more antenatal visits with at least one to a medically trained provider, measurement of weight and blood pressure, testing of blood and urine, and receipt of information on potential danger signs at least once during pregnancy. Though Bangladesh has almost universal ANC coverage, there is widespread inequality in the quality of these services. Traditional statistical models utilized in studies have tended to disregard complicated interconnections between socio-demographic, service-based, and regional factors that influence the quality of ANC. Using nationally representative data, this paper applies machine learning (ML) approaches to classify ANC quality, identify regional hotspots of low-quality care, and its factors.
methodsThis study used data from the 2022 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS), with a sample of 4587 women aged 15-49 who received ANC services. To predict binary ANC quality outcomes (high vs. low), three models were used: logistic regression, random forest (RF), and gradient boosting machine (GBM). Class imbalance was addressed using the ROSE (Random Over-Sampling Examples) technique, and model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve with 5-fold cross-validation. The most influential predictors were identified using feature importance analysis, and projected probabilities were aggregated at the cluster and division levels for spatial hotspot analysis. Geographic mapping was then utilized to demonstrate regional differences.
resultsThe GBM model outperformed the others, with the greatest prediction value (accuracy: 81.3%, sensitivity: 70.6%, specificity: 84.7%, AUC-ROC: 0.889). Number of ANC visits, wealth index, place of residence, maternal education, and media access were all significant predictors. Spatial studies found hidden regions with high ANC visit coverage but low predicted ANC quality, highlighting considerable spatial differences in service quality. These hotspots are concentrated in Rangpur and Sylhet, which are far from Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh, demonstrating spatial disparities in the usage of ANC services.
conclusionsThe study shows that machine learning can classify ANC quality and reveal spatial disparities, aiding policymakers in targeting programs and allocating resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.