Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41298013›Full record

ReviewBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2025

Improving communication between healthcare professionals and patients living with advanced breast cancer: a global expert review and call-to-action for 2025-2035 (Goal 5).

Lesley Fallowfield, Fran Boyle, Renate Haidinger, Kara Magsanoc-Alikpala, Luzia Travado, Matti Aapro, Zsofia Wolkensdorfer, Alexandra Lewis, Georgia Attfield, Fatima Cardoso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Delivering online communication skills training for radiation therapists.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lesley FallowfieldSussex Health Outcomes Research and Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Fran BoyleMater Hospital, Sydney, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Renate HaidingerGerman Breast Cancer Association, Munich, Germany.
Kara Magsanoc-AlikpalaICanServe Foundation, Manila, Philippines; Informal Technical Working Group of the World Health Organization's Global Breast Cancer Initiative, Manila, Philippines; Lancet Commission on Women and Cancer Patient Advocacy Committee, Manila, Philippines.
Luzia TravadoChampalimaud Clinical & Research Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Matti AaproBreast Center, Genolier Cancer Center, Genolier, Switzerland.
Zsofia WolkensdorferVML Health, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Alexandra LewisVML Health, London, United Kingdom.
Georgia AttfieldVML Health, London, United Kingdom.
Fatima CardosoAdvanced Breast Cancer (ABC) Global Alliance, Lisbon, Portugal. Electronic address: fcardoso@abcglobalalliance.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complexity of advanced breast cancer (ABC) and its treatment landscape makes communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients particularly challenging. It is essential that all HCPs receive comprehensive communication skills training starting at medical or nursing school and continuing throughout their careers. Effective communication can improve trust, treatment adherence, and ultimately, outcomes; it also facilitates shared and educated decision-making, all of which is crucial to ensure patients receive the most appropriate treatment and care. This manuscript explores the global landscape of communication skills training, highlights remaining communication gaps, and assesses the preference for, and implementation of, shared decision-making in clinical practice. It draws on research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) Communication skills trainings now cover a broader range of topics; b) People with ABC report their broader communication needs are often not met; c) Doctors and patients differ in their preferences for shared decision-making in ABC; d) Improving ABC care requires patients to feel supported in expressing their needs. The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025-2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCommunicationHealth PersonnelProfessional-Patient RelationsDecision Making, SharedFemaleHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsAdvanced breast cancerCommunicationCommunication skills trainingMetastatic breast cancerShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID41298013
PMCPMC12683128

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.