ReviewBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2025
Improving communication between healthcare professionals and patients living with advanced breast cancer: a global expert review and call-to-action for 2025-2035 (Goal 5).
Review in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delivering online communication skills training for radiation therapists.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- EBCC-15 manifesto: Removing age-related barriers to improve equity in breast cancer care.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Review
- Patient Activation, Patient-Physician Communication Quality, and Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Longitudinal Study of Cancer Survivors.Psycho-oncology · 2026Observational
- Evaluating AI-generated patient education materials for endometrial cancer surgery: a comparative analysis of response quality, reliability, and readability between ChatGPT and DeepSeek models.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Self-reported patient experiences in a peer-support community: What do cancer patients value?Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complexity of advanced breast cancer (ABC) and its treatment landscape makes communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients particularly challenging. It is essential that all HCPs receive comprehensive communication skills training starting at medical or nursing school and continuing throughout their careers. Effective communication can improve trust, treatment adherence, and ultimately, outcomes; it also facilitates shared and educated decision-making, all of which is crucial to ensure patients receive the most appropriate treatment and care. This manuscript explores the global landscape of communication skills training, highlights remaining communication gaps, and assesses the preference for, and implementation of, shared decision-making in clinical practice. It draws on research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) Communication skills trainings now cover a broader range of topics; b) People with ABC report their broader communication needs are often not met; c) Doctors and patients differ in their preferences for shared decision-making in ABC; d) Improving ABC care requires patients to feel supported in expressing their needs. The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025-2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.