ArticleScientific reports2025
The global epidemiology, risk factors, and mortality prediction of nocardiosis: an easily missed opportunistic infection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 56-Year-Old Woman With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus on Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Prophylaxis Presenting With Breakthrough Nocardiosis.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Building and Validating an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Health-Promoting Behaviors in Older Adults: A Multicenter Study.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor: Evidence for a two-step species-level pulmonary nocardiosis diagnostic approach.World journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Molecular mechanisms underlyingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Case Report of a Solitary Brain Abscess due toCase reports in infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Essential fatty acids disrupt the mycolic acid-rich cell envelope of clinicalFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic and Genomic Feature Analysis of CutaneousInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study was to comprehensively investigate the epidemiology of nocardiosis worldwide and develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict mortality in patients with nocardiosis. The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for the literature review using the keywords: "Nocardia" or "nocardiosis" through 31 August 2024, 9,750 cases of nocardiosis were reported. Nine ML algorithms were employed to predict the mortality in patients with nocardiosis. A total of 9,750 reported cases were identified and included. Most cases were from North America and Asia. The mean age of patients was 50.4 ± 19.3, with a male predominance (64.7%). The overall all-cause mortality rate was 19.8%, although disseminated infections were associated with a higher mortality rate of 31.7%. Since 2000, the number of reported nocardiosis cases has increased markedly, while the all-cause mortality rate has decreased significantly and stabilized. The distribution of Nocardia species exhibited regional variation. Advanced age, male, underlying diseases, disseminated infections, infection type, clinical features, and use of corticosteroids or immunosuppressants had a higher risk of all-cause mortality [Odds Ratio (ORs) = 1.35-2.63, P < 0.05]. The stochastic gradient boosting (SGBT) model outperformed eight other machine learning models, accurately predicting mortality in patients with nocardiosis across both training and test datasets. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the global epidemiology and species distribution of nocardiosis, highlighting distinct regional patterns. An interpretable ML model was developed and validated that helps clinicians identify high-risk patients early and provides a basis for developing personalized treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.