ArticleScientific reports2025
A autophagy related gene signature to predict the prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma and tumor immune microenvironment evaluation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) has a poor prognosis and responds poorly to immunotherapy. Growing evidence indicates that autophagy promotes tumor progression, and autophagy-related genes (ARGs) have been established as prognostic markers in various cancers. Based on consensus clustering of ARGs, 177 PAAD cases were classified into two subtypes, with cluster B exhibiting weaker anti-tumor immunity. Using univariate COX and Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, 13 ARGs were identified to construct a prognostic model. A risk score formula was developed and validated using the GSE183795 dataset. Patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups, with the high-risk group associated with poorer survival. The model showed strong predictive accuracy, with time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.762 to 0.848 in the training cohort and 0.658 to 0.714 in the validation cohort. Further analysis revealed that high-risk patients had suppressed immunity but increased sensitivity to certain chemotherapy drugs. Additionally, high tumor mutational burden (TMB) and RNA stemness score (RNAss) were correlated with worse prognosis in high-risk patients. This ARG-based model effectively predicts PAAD outcomes and may guide clinical treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.