ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
Effectiveness of virtual reality-based exercise rehabilitation for enhancing functional outcomes and quality of life in adult cancer survivors: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Emerging Technologies in Physiotherapy for Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Melatonin in Integrative Oncology: Biological Mechanisms, Therapeutic Evidence and Implementation Strategies.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Home-based, telehealth, and hybrid exercise interventions for adults undergoing or recovering from hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis systematic review aims to synthesize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness and safety of virtual reality-based exercise rehabilitation (VRER) in adult cancer survivors.
methodsFollowing PRISMA 2020, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched up to November 2024. Only RCTs of VR-based exercise in adult patients with cancer were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB2 tool. Outcomes were narratively synthesized across strength/range of motion, functional status, quality of life, physical performance, and adverse events.
resultsEight RCTs involving 359 participants with breast, prostate, brain, or combined cancer types were included. VRER increased shoulder mobility and reduced fear of movement compared with usual care. Functional status, specifically activities of daily living, showed consistent improvement. Physical performance including better balance, endurance, and activity level improved. Three trials reported quality-of-life advantages, mainly in physical and vitality domains, though heterogeneity of measures limited comparison. Safety was good with only mild, transient symptoms and no serious adverse events.
conclusionsVRER has promising effects on mobility, daily function, physical performance, and quality of life in cancer survivors, with strong adherence and safety. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: VR-based exercise is an effective, safe adjunct to conventional rehabilitation. By improving mobility, adherence, and well-being, it offers benefits and can be integrated into survivorship care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41298970What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.