ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2026
Prognostic assessment of the Japanese Renal Pathology Society classification in Chinese patients with histologically confirmed diabetic kidney disease.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to comparatively evaluate the prognostic value of the Japanese Renal Pathology Society (JRPS) classification for predicting diabetic kidney disease (DKD) progression in Chinese patients.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 124 patients diagnosed with DKD from 2014 to 2020. Patients were classified into four JRPS classification grades based on the J-score. Renal survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression, and predictive accuracy was compared with the RPS classification and total renal chronicity score using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the DeLong test.
resultsOver a median follow-up of 37 months, 76.6% of patients reached renal outcomes, including 40.3% progressing to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Higher JRPS classification grades were independently associated with adverse renal outcomes. However, ROC analysis demonstrated that the JRPS classification exhibited inferior discriminative performance compared with the traditional RPS classification system.
conclusionThe JRPS classification was independently associated with renal outcomes but showed inferior discriminatory performance compared with the RPS classification. These findings suggest that JRPS classification may provide complementary pathological information rather than serving as a primary prognostic tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.