Evidence mapPaperPMID 41299203Full record

ArticleEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2025

Transferability and Reproducibility of the HepaRG CometChip Assay.

Leslie Recio, Carol Swartz, Lincoln Martin, Emily Rottinger, Stefan Pfuhler, Erica Pinkus, Daniel J Roberts, Leon F Stankowski, Simran Kaushal, Norah A Owiti and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. New Approach Methods in Genetic Toxicology.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2026
    Article
  3. Transferability and Reproducibility of the HepaRG CometChip Assay.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Leslie RecioIntegrated Laboratory Systems, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Carol SwartzIntegrated Laboratory Systems, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Lincoln MartinIntegrated Laboratory Systems, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Emily RottingerProctor & Gamble Co., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Stefan PfuhlerProctor & Gamble Co., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8869-5975
Erica PinkusCharles River Laboratories, Illinois, USA.
Daniel J RobertsCharles River Laboratories, Illinois, USA.
Leon F StankowskiCharles River Laboratories, Illinois, USA.
Simran KaushalDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Norah A OwitiDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Bevin P EngelwardDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4322-3573

Funding

CometChip: Development of a high throughput DNA damage assay in hepatocytesU44ES024698 · NIEHS · INTEGRATED LABORATORY SYSTEMS, LLC · PI ENGELWARD, BEVIN P., SWARTZ, CAROL D. · 2018 to 2020
$2.3M
Charles River LaboratoriesNIEHS NIH HHS U44 ES024698Proctor and Gamble CoSBIR 2B 5U44ES024698-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This interlaboratory evaluation of HepaRG CometChip was conducted to assess transferability and reproducibility of this new approach methodology (NAM) across four laboratories. Concentrations inducing up to ~70% relative cytotoxicity were determined by the organizing laboratory, and frozen chemical formulation blocks were sent to each participant. When noncytotoxic, 10 mM was the maximum dose. Cultures were exposed once daily for three consecutive days, and both cytotoxicity assessment, via ATP quantification, and comet analysis, commenced 3-4 h after initiation of the final exposure. Positive response was statistical pairwise significance (p < 0.05) with concentration-related increases in %Tail DNA across ≥ 2 consecutive exposures. For 8 of 11 compounds, all four labs generated unanimous test results, with four negative compounds (2-acetylaminofluorene [2-AAF], 2,4-dichlorophenol, eugenol and hydroquinone) and four positive compounds (azidothymidine, benzo(a)pyrene [BP], cyclophosphamide [CP], ethyl methanesulfonate).For the remaining chemicals, three of four labs generated negative calls for amitrole, cadmium chloride, and DMBA. In cases where bulky lesions were anticipated, the magnitude of %Tail DNA was low, due to the inherent insensitivity of the alkaline comet assay (not the CometChip per se) to detect bulky adducts repaired by nucleotide excision repair. This is supported by the small magnitude in %Tail DNA induced by BP and CP. Taken together, for all compounds there was majority agreement in CometChip results across participating laboratories supporting that the endpoint is readily transferable to new labs. Overall, this platform is a promising human-relevant NAM, with a physiologically relevant detoxification process that could be incorporated into rodent replacement strategies.

Indexed as

Comet AssayDNA DamageMutagensHumansLaboratoriesReproducibility of ResultsMutagensalkaline cometcomet assayCometChipgenotoxicity testingHepaRG

Identifiers

PMID41299203
PMCPMC12703573

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.