ReviewBMC primary care2025
A knowledge, attitude and practice-based integrative literature review of community health worker training on stroke and cardiovascular diseases in low-and middle-income countries.
Review in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) and stroke remain the leading causes of preventable morbidity and mortality, especially in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Community Health Workers (CHWs) are well-positioned to support prevention but are often inadequately trained for CVD and stroke-specific challenges. This review aimed to examine the design, content and delivery of CHW training programmes for CVD and stroke prevention using the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) framework to identify gaps and advise future curriculum development.
methodsAn Integrative Literature Review was conducted. First-level analysis used deductive coding guided by the KAP framework to organise the data on training approaches, barriers, facilitators, etc. Second-level analysis applied the Framework Analysis method by Ritchie and Spencer to identify deeper themes across the studies.
resultsTwenty-two articles were included in the final analysis representing diverse settings across Africa (n = 11), Asia (n = 6), Latin America [1] and LMICs (n = 4) from different continents. First-level analysis revealed common themes among the studies, highlighting areas such as CHW understanding of CVD/stroke risk factors, screening activities, community education duties, and challenges like lack of supervision and ambiguity in roles. Notably missing were training on attitudes and stroke-specific materials. The second-level analysis was structured according to the five curriculum pillars and their cross-cutting themes, which revealed critical training gaps in areas such as culturally appropriate communication, initiating behaviour change, data literacy, system navigation, and support structures. While CHW confidence and motivation improved post-training, these outcomes were not explicitly addressed in the curriculum.
conclusionsCommunity health worker training programmes for non-communicable diseases often lack the specificity and depth required for effective stroke and CVD prevention. This review identified critical gaps across five curriculum pillars namely: Communication and Education, Community Engagement, Health System Navigation, Clinical Competencies and Support and Accountability. A unique finding in this review was the limited evidence focused on training CHWs’ attitudes – an essential component of their role, and particularly with regard to stroke and CVD prevention. While positive shifts in CHW confidence and motivation are observed post-training, these are rarely intentional learning outcomes. Future curricula must explicitly integrate these domains to better equip CHWs for context-specific, culturally aligned, and sustainable CVD and stroke prevention in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.