ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Exploring the needs and preferences of older trauma patients: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrauma in older people is emerging as a major health issue, with falls being the most common cause. Despite existing guidelines for trauma care of older populations, uptake is limited, and undertreatment persists. This study aimed to understand the needs and preferences of older people and their families from health systems following traumatic injuries and define the key components of a preferred trauma care model offered by health services for older populations.
methodsThis research adopted participatory design principles, engaging older people and their families, who had interacted with local healthcare services, to participate in a workshop which included structured activities and questions designed to facilitate discussion of the participants' experiences of trauma, subsequent healthcare and reflections on needs and preferences in care. Qualitative data were collected, coded, and analysed thematically.
resultsSeven patients and six family members attended one of two workshops. Most patient participants were women, with a mean age of 82 years. Participants reported negative feelings following trauma, including uncertainty, shock and fear, decreased confidence, and feeling burdensome. Recovery goals were focused on regaining independence, participating in movement and exercise, and maximizing social connection. Communication, empathy and interpersonal skills in care, and system-related factors were identified as key factors impacting care and the recovery experience following trauma. To improve trauma care, participants recommended care coordination, improved access to home support and rehabilitation, investment in staff expertise and training, and a specialised trauma service for older adults.
conclusionsThis study underscores the importance of a comprehensive and person-centered approach to trauma care for older people, offering valuable insights for healthcare providers and policymakers striving to enhance the quality of care and improve outcomes for this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.