ArticleBMC nephrology2025
Artificial intelligence-based diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease using urinary VOC biosensor data.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic kidney disease (DKD) remains a leading cause of chronic kidney disease worldwide. However, current diagnostic methods rely on indirect biomarkers or invasive renal biopsy. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of urinary volatile organic compound (VOC) profiling, combined with machine learning, for non-invasive classification of DKD.
methodsUrine samples were collected from 127 participants divided into four diagnostic groups: healthy controls, patients with type 2 diabetes without nephropathy, biopsy-confirmed DKD, and patients with primary nephrotic syndromes. Samples were analyzed using a chemiresistive VOC biosensor. A total of 15,240 signal-derived features were extracted based on sensor response dynamics. Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied to balance class sizes. Four machine learning classifiers-Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbors, and Naïve Bayes-were trained and validated using stratified data. Performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsRandom Forest achieved the best test performance, with 86% accuracy, 0.91 precision, 0.86 recall, F1-score of 0.86, and an AUC of 0.95. K-fold cross-validation confirmed the model's robustness and generalizability. Random Forest consistently outperformed other models in distinguishing DKD from both diabetic and non-diabetic glomerular diseases, demonstrating its strong discriminative capability.
conclusionsUrinary VOC-based machine learning models provide proof-of-concept evidence for non-invasive DKD diagnosis. Random Forest, in particular, shows potential as a triage tool to differentiate DKD from other glomerular conditions, which may in the future help reduce reliance on biopsy and support earlier identification in nephrology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.