Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299350›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Waiting room and hallway care for older adults: a qualitative study with emergency nurses and technicians.

Sarah J Nessen, Ari B Friedman, Annika R Bhananker, K Jane Muir, Anita N Chary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah J NessenPerelman School of Medicine, Penn Center for Emergency Care and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Floor 5, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. sjnessen96@gmail.com.
Ari B FriedmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Ari.Friedman@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Annika R BhanankerCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
K Jane MuirDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Anita N CharyCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

ADVANCED TRAINING IN NURSING OUTCOMES RESEARCHT32NR007104 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JACQUELINE MARGO BROOKS CARTHON, EILEEN T LAKE · 1999 to 2026
$11.6M
Trajectories of Frailty and Cognitive Impairment in Older AdultsR03AG078933 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FRIEDMAN, ARI B · 2022 to 2023
$325k
Identifying Implementation Strategies for Emergency Department (ED) Delirium Screening in Older AdultsR03AG078943 · NIA · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI CHARY, ANITA · 2022 to 2023
$320k
Houston Veterans Administration Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety CIN13-413National Institute of Nursing Research of the National Institutes of Health T32NR007104NIA NIH HHS R03 AG078933NIA NIH HHS R03AG078933NIA NIH HHS R03 AG078943NIA NIH HHS R03AG078943NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency Department (ED) crowding places older ED patients at risk for adverse outcomes. Crowding often necessitates ED waiting room and hallway care, but there has been limited research on approaches to care for older adults in these settings. Frontline clinician insights can inform best practices for older adults in the context of the ongoing ED crowding crisis. Our objective was to describe the experiences of emergency nurses and technicians in providing waiting room and hallway care for older adults.

methodsThis qualitative study used individual, semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 20 ED nurses and technicians at a single urban, academic trauma center. Interviews took place between November 2023 and March 2024 and focused on challenges faced in triage and when providing care in the ED waiting room / hallways. We analyzed interview transcripts through thematic analysis with a deductive and inductive coding approach.

resultsFour major themes related to hallway and waiting room care for older adults emerged: (1) Unique safety concerns for older adults; (2) Limitations to person-centered care; (3) Needed resources; and (4) Adaptations to systemic dysfunction. Participants describe that dedicated waiting room staff, separate spaces for older adults, and rooming protocols that incorporate geriatric syndromes would likely enhance patient safety.

conclusionsResource constraints restrict ED clinicians from ensuring safe, high-quality waiting room and hallway care for older adults. Systems-based solutions to improve care for older adults in these settings include transparency and reporting around hospital crowding, safe clinician staffing levels, and investment in dedicated ED spaces for older adults.

Indexed as

CrowdingEmergency Medical TechniciansEmergency NursingEmergency Service, HospitalNursesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchTriageBoardingCrowdingEmergency departmentOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID41299350
PMCPMC12659490

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.