Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299425›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Phase IV international prospective validation of the EORTC patient satisfaction core questionnaire (EORTC PATSAT-C33) and outpatient module (EORTC OUT-PATSAT7).

Anne Brédart, Jean-Luc Kop, Omar Shamieh, Louis Fox, Waleed Alrjoub, Thierry Conroy, Nazim Serdar Turhal, I Juan Arraras, Renée Bultijnck, Amélie Harle and 17 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05989191 (An International Field Study for the Reliability and Validity of the EORTC PATSAT-C33 and the EORTC OUT-PATSAT7 Questionnaires), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05989191 active not recruitingnot on this map

An International Field Study for the Reliability and Validity of the EORTC PATSAT-C33 and the EORTC OUT-PATSAT7 Questionnaires

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut CurieRan2019 to 2025Enrolled690ConditionsCancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comorbidity, treatment toxicity and satisfaction with cancer care: an international cross-sectional study based on the EORTC PATSAT-C33 and OUT-PATSAT7.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Anne BrédartPsycho-Oncology Unit, SHARE Team, Institut Curie, PSL, Paris, & Health Process & Psychopathology Laboratory, University Paris Cité, LPPS EA 4057, Boulogne Billancourt, France. anne.bredart@curie.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1864-5371
Jean-Luc KopUniversité de Lorraine, 2LPN, Nancy, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6963-8411
Omar ShamiehDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Centre for Palliative and Cancer Care in Conflict (CPCCC), University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3635-8624
Louis FoxTransforming Cancer OUtcomes Through Research (TOUR) Group at King's College London and Cancer & Surgery at Guy's Hospital, London, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8280-1797
Waleed AlrjoubKing Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6098-9891
Thierry ConroyUniversité de Lorraine, Inserm INSPIIRE, Nancy, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7548-284X
Nazim Serdar TurhalAnadolu Medical Centre, Çayırova, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1013-5676
I Juan ArrarasDepartment of Oncology, Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4415-2570
Renée BultijnckDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4122-2323
Amélie HarleUniversity Hospitals Dorset, Poole and Bournemouth, Bournemouth, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7743-9626
Mieke Van HemelrijckTransforming Cancer OUtcomes Through Research (TOUR) Group at King's College London and Cancer & Surgery at Guy's Hospital, London, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7317-0858
Eleonora PintoHospital Psychology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5404-5958
Eric J U RothDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Católica Boliviana "San Pablo", Obrajes, La Paz, Bolivia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1909-2462
Georgios IoannidisOncology Department, Nicosia General Hospital, State Health Services Organization, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2535-7279
Anna CostantiniPsycho-Oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Universitary Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5955-5209
Tara ChalkMount Vernon Cancer Centre, East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, London, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2964-1891
Teresa YoungMount Vernon Cancer Centre, East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, London, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-2980
Gudrun RohdeDepartment of Health and Nursing, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8538-7237
Hiroto IshikiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0800-2161
Yuichiro KikawaKansai Medical University Hospital, Hirataka, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3852-5991
Heike SchmidtUniversity Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Radiotherapy and Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0922-4022
Vassilios VassiliouBank of Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Stephanie ShaylerUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England.
Frédéric MarchalDépartement de Chirurgie, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN, UMR 7039, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7685-6070
Anota AmélieDirection de la Recherche Clinique et de L'Innovation (DRCI), Centre Léon Bérard, Quality of Life and Cancer Clinical Research Platform, Lyon, France.
Jens LehmannUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4670-7517
EORTC Quality of Life Group

Funding

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 007-2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in cancer care require ongoing monitoring of patient satisfaction using rigorous questionnaires. The EORTC Quality of Life Group has cross-culturally developed a patient satisfaction core questionnaire (PATSAT-C33) to be used in any hospital cancer care settings and an outpatient satisfaction module (OUT-PATSAT7) to address specific aspects of ambulatory care. This multi-center international prospective study aimed to validate the PATSAT-C33 and OUT-PATSAT7, including assessing its acceptability.

methodsPatients (N = 690) affected by any cancer site or stage equally distributed by age and gender, were enrolled in in- and out-patient cancer settings from 20 institutions, 12 countries and 5 geographic/cultural areas. Among them, 675 completed the PATSAT-C33 alongside the EORTC QLQ-C30, Oberst's perception of care quality 5-item, and 'intention to recommend the hospital' 1-item. Among the 532 outpatients, 526 also completed the OUT-PATSAT7. A subset completed a two-week retest (N = 120 & 96 for the PATSAT-C33 & OUT-PATSAT7, respectively) or one-year responsiveness-to-change assessment (RCA) (N = 166 & 155). Comprehensive psychometric testing was performed.

resultsFull item completion was high (85% & 88%), 83% of patients took ≤ 20 min to complete both questionnaires (40 items); 5% of patients required help with understanding questionnaire items. Confirmatory factor analyses evidenced satisfactory fit on the eleven PATSAT-C33 and two OUT-PATSAT7 multi-item scales (CFI/TLI > 0.90; RMSEA < 0.10 and = 0.108, respectively). Internal consistency was good to excellent (all ≥ 0.80); test-retest reliability was fair (0.48, 1 scale), good (0.60-0.74, 11 scales) to excellent (≥ 0.75, 7 scales). Convergent validity was supported by correlations of ≥ 0.40 with related Oberst's scales and < 0.30 with unrelated QLQ-C30 scales. Known-groups differences was shown for comorbidity, toxicity, global health, care expectations and intention to recommend the hospital. Change over time was captured in groups defined based on change in global health, cancer care setting, and the receipt of supportive care over the past year.

conclusionsThis study supports the psychometric robustness of the EORTC PATSAT-C33 and OUT-PATSAT7 and their promising usefulness in monitoring cancer care within and across cancer care settings from different cultures and cancer patient populations.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05989191, August 2, 2023.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareNeoplasmsPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsProspective StudiesPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer careEORTC questionnairePatient satisfactionPREMPsychometricsQuality of care perception

Identifiers

PMID41299425
PMCPMC12648786

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.