SynthesisBMC ophthalmology2025
Fractal analysis of retinal microvasculature and cardiovascular outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Three-dimensional Analytical Framework for Retinal Microvasculature Reveals Layer-associated Vulnerability in Development and Neovascular Remodeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Choriocapillaris Flow and Retinal Vascular Fractal Dimension in Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Retinal Ischemic Perivascular Lesions Are Associated with Cardiovascular Diseases in Patients with Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo access associations between retinal vascular fractal dimension (FD) and the risk of the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in this systematic review.
methodsPubMed, Web of science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for cohort and cross-sectional studies with data on the association between FD and CVD risk published up to June 2025. The combined risk estimates were estimated using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed according to pre-defined characteristics. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to examined the robustness of the results. This study is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42024591961.
resultsFourteen eligible studies (eight were cohort design and six were cross-sectional design) were included and analyzed. When FD was regarded as a continuous variable, the significant association between decreased FD and the incidence of the CVD (RR: 1.14, 95%CI: 1.05-1.24) was found. When FD was regarded as a categorical variable, the participants in the lower FD group at the baseline had the greater incidence risk of CVD compared to those in higher FD group (RR: 1.51, 95%CI: 1.07-2.14). Furthermore, people with reduced FD may inclined to have the established CVD (RR: 1.70, 95%CI: 1.23-2.37). The sensitivity analysis indicated that the above results are robust. We also found that when arterioles and venules were analyzed separately, the association between decreased arteriolar FD and CVD risk remained significant (cohort studies, RR: 1.08, 95%CI: 1.01-1.17; cross-sectional, RR: 1.90, 95%CI: 1.51-2.37), whereas no such association was observed in venular FD (cohort studies, RR: 0.96, 95%CI: 0.84-1.08; cross-sectional, RR: 1.42, 95%CI: 0.89-2.29).
conclusionThe decreased retinal microvascular FD was significantly associated with the CVD risk, especially in retinal arteriole. The findings of this study supported that FD may be a potential marker of CVD risk including stroke and coronary heart disease. Noninvasive FD measurement may act as an adjunct to existing CVD risk stratification, facilitating early screening and diagnosis of individuals at elevated CVD risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.