ArticleBMC public health2025
Recommendations for optimising physical activity after gestational diabetes: system targets.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGestational diabetes increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes ten-fold postnatally, but physical activity can significantly and independently reduce this risk. Yet most interventions targeting women after gestational diabetes have not been able to change physical activity, despite seeing significant dietary changes or weight loss.
methodsThis study used a realist-inspired approach to produce theory-based recommendations, about what could work to optimise physical activity after gestational diabetes. An advisory group was initiated and guided study conceptualisation, recruitment, data collection and reviewed draft recommendations. The socio-ecological model was used to scaffold theories and create meaningful recommendations at different systems-levels. Theories were generated using systematic reviews and grey literature and were further iteratively tested and refined through qualitative data collection with a wide range of professional stakeholders and people with lived experience. Theory-based recommendations were developed and further refined through consultations with women with previous gestational diabetes, researchers, public health professionals, and Diabetes UK representatives.
resultsTen final theories were generated. Women need to be empowered, feel supported not just depending on family, have access to co-located and affordable childcare in physical activity spaces and be able to share experiences. The final recommendations spanned across social (n = 3), organisational (n = 6), community (n = 3) and policy (n = 6) levels of the socio-ecological model.
conclusionsFundamental patient care requirements must be fulfilled first, as without improvements in continuity of care and dedicated follow-up appointments after gestational diabetes, there is no opportunity to engage in physical activity conversations. Capitalising on existing community and local resources will also be helpful. To access activity spaces, co-located childcare is essential for some women, with further support to tailor physical activity as needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.