ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Antibiotic use and resistance awareness among ruminant and poultry farmers in Tunisia.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction: Antibiotic use and resistance awareness among ruminant and poultry farmers in Tunisia.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial resistance in poultry meat in the mediterranean region: prevalence, public health implications, and control strategies: A review.Poultry science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance (AMR) is a growing global public health threat. In food-producing animals, antibiotic overuse and misuse play a key role in its emergence and transmission to humans. This study examined antibiotic use patterns among ruminant (cattle, sheep, goats) and poultry (chickens, turkeys) farmers in Tunisia, explored drivers of their decisions, and assessed awareness of AMR risks. A structured, anonymous 12-item questionnaire was administered face-to-face by 11 veterinarians to 110 farmers in Sousse, Mahdia, and Monastir (Sahel region). Data were analyzed statistically. Results showed that 90% of farmers lacked a livestock register, and 92.7% practiced self-medication without veterinary prescriptions. Digestive diseases (88.2%) were the most treated, followed by foot (60%), mammary (60%), and respiratory diseases (41.8%). Self-medication was significantly associated with treatment cost (p = 0.005) and over-the-counter antibiotic access (p = 0.016). Misuse was frequent: 62.7% did not complete treatment, 82.7% stopped once symptoms resolved, and 61.8% ignored withdrawal periods. Overall, 94.5% were unaware of AMR risks, and only 5.5% had received training in good husbandry practices. These findings underscore the urgent need for farmer education, strengthened veterinary oversight, and promotion of prudent antibiotic use to mitigate AMR risks and safeguard animal and public health in Tunisia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.