ArticleBMC women's health2025
Screening of the founder pathogenic variants BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Russian metropolitan women.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHereditary cancer and associated high risk genetic variants accountable for 5-10% of all breast cancer cases carry a significant burden on the health system and the pathogenic variants carriers. The harm from these factors can be significantly reduced through the timely detection of genetic alterations and implementation of health monitoring programs for pathogenic variants carriers.
methodsWe conducted a population-based genetic screening of unselected women residing in a large metropolitan area in 2018. Testing targeted eight recurrent BRCA1/2 founder pathogenic variants using validated real-time PCR assays. Women with a detected variant were invited into a structured prospective surveillance program with standardized capture of clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the prevalence of BRCA1/2 founder variants; secondary outcomes included age and family-history profiles, adherence to surveillance, and cancer incidence and stage among carriers. Analyses used descriptive summaries, χ² or Fisher's exact tests for proportions, Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables, and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
resultsThe study included a large cohort of 107,300 women. 402 identified pathogenic variant carriers were offered consultations by a geneticist and regular health monitoring, 94.3% of them agreed to participate and made a median of two visits. Among 402 identified BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers, 386 women (0.36%) had pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 gene and 16 women (0.01%) had pathogenic variants in the BRCA2 gene. The BRCA1 variant c.5266dup accounted for 66.2% of all pathogenic variant detected. BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants were significantly associated with a high incidence of cancer in both pathogenic variants carriers and their relatives. Only 27.2% of pathogenic variants carriers met clinical guidelines for genetic screening, while 6.3% of women without detected pathogenic variants were eligible for genetic testing. Through a follow-up medical surveillance program, the percentage of cancers detected at an early stage in pathogenic variants carriers increased from 65% to 93%.
conclusionsThe findings of this study highlight the critical need for improved genetic screening protocols to identify high-risk individuals effectively. By refining clinical guidelines and implementing comprehensive follow-up programs, healthcare systems can enhance early detection rates of cancers associated with BRCA1/2 variants, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and personalized healthcare strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.