ArticleBMC psychology2025
War exposure and mental health in Sudanese medical students: the roles of psychological flexibility and self-esteem.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exposure to Conflict-Related News and Psychological Distress Among Nursing Students: The Mediating Role of Sleep Difficulties and Study Disruption.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe ongoing conflict in Sudan has disrupted medical education and affected the mental well-being of students. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of war exposure on psychological inflexibility (the inability to adaptively respond to distressing internal experiences), self-esteem, and mental health outcomes, specifically depression and anxiety.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in March 2025 among 148 medical students at Gadarif University, categorized as war-exposed (42.6%) or non-exposed (57.4%). Validated Arabic questionnaires assessed psychological inflexibility (AAQ-II), self-esteem (RSE), depression (PHQ-9), and anxiety (GAD-7). Mann-Whitney U tests and linear regression were used to assess group differences and predictors.
resultsNo significant differences were found between groups in psychological inflexibility (p = 0.451) or self-esteem (p = 0.327). However, war-exposed students had higher depression (p = 0.031) and anxiety (p = 0.025). In regression models, war exposure was associated with increased depression (β = -2.371, p = 0.011) and anxiety (β = -2.529, p = 0.005). Furthermore, in both groups, higher psychological inflexibility predicted worse depression (β = 0.126, p < 0.001) and anxiety (β = 0.150, p < 0.001), while lower self-esteem predicted higher depression (β = -0.295, p = 0.009). A 1-point increase in inflexibility corresponded to a 0.13-point increase in depression symptoms.
conclusionWar exposure was associated with increased depression and anxiety, though it did not significantly alter psychological inflexibility or self-esteem. These psychological traits were independently associated with mental health outcomes, suggesting their role as key vulnerability factors. Strengthening resilience and self-worth-through interventions that enhance emotional regulation and coping-may reduce the psychological burden of conflict. Limitations include the cross-sectional design and sampling from a single institution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.