Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299878›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2025

The ABILHAND-23 Patient Reported Outcome Measure in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Analysis With the Nine Hole Peg Test.

Sean Apap Mangion, Charles Wade, Tom Williams, Alessia Bianchi, Floriana De Angelis, Sarah Wright, Nevin John, Anisha Doshi, Alberto Calvi, Obioma Oraluzume and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Sean Apap MangionQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3399-7823
Charles WadeQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5199-7566
Tom WilliamsQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8197-0177
Alessia BianchiQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Floriana De AngelisQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Sarah WrightQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1146-1801
Nevin JohnQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9834-4498
Anisha DoshiQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Alberto CalviQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Obioma OraluzumeQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Maya LeibowitzQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Guglielmo VecchioQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
James BlackstoneComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Marie BraisherQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Graziella FavaratoDepartment of Statistics, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Jennifer NicholasLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Centre of Global Change and Health, Medical Statistics, London, UK.
Rachel FarrellDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, The National Hospital for Neurology, London, UK.
Jeremy ChatawayQueen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
UCL MS‐STAT2 Investigators

Funding

Multiple Sclerosis Society - UKNational Institute for Health and Care Research HTA Project: 15/57/143National Multiple Sclerosis Society - USRosetrees Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with progressive multiple sclerosis (pwPMS), who typically have established lower limb dysfunction, experience greater disability from upper limb dysfunction (ULD). The 9-hole peg test (9HPT) is the primary clinical measure for ULD but does not fully capture the patient experience. The ABILHAND-23 is a well-validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that evaluates bimanual ability in daily function. However, no large-scale studies have assessed if the 9HPT reflects the individual ULD experience in pwPMS.

objectivesWe sought to (van Munster et al. 2023) assess the associations between the ABILHAND-23 and 9HPT, and (Huertas-Hoyas et al. 2020) to assess the ability of the 9HPT and other relevant covariables to predict ABILHAND-23 scores, using baseline data from the MS-STAT2 trial, a phase 3 study on simvastatin for secondary progressive MS (SPMS).

methodsA cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the UCLH cohort of the MS-STAT2 trial was performed using multiple linear regression to predict ABILHAND-23 logit scores by 9HPT.

results225 participants were analyzed. ABILHAND-23 scores moderately correlated with the 9HPT (rho = 0.47). Regression analysis showed that better 9HPT performance modestly predicted ABILHAND-23 logits (β = -0.05, SE 0.008, p-value < 0.001).

conclusionThe 9HPT only modestly predicts the ABILHAND-23 but does not fully capture the individual's daily disability experience, underscoring the value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) like the ABILHAND-23 in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic ProgressivePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresUpper ExtremityActivities of Daily LivingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedclinical trialsoutcome measuresprogressivePROMs

Identifiers

PMID41299878
PMCPMC12657254

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.