Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41299888›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2026

Whole-genome paternal uniparental disomy identified through prenatal single-nucleotide polymorphism-based cell-free DNA screening.

P Benn, K Hashimoto, V Souter, R Dhamankar, W Xu, D Kijacic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P BennUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7917-6946
K HashimotoNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, USA.
V SouterNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, USA.
R DhamankarNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, USA.
W XuNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, USA.
D KijacicNatera, Inc., Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

Natera
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrenatal single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening can identify genome-wide paternal uniparental disomy (GW-UPDpat), including cases with complete hydatidiform mole with a coexisting fetus (CHMCF), those with placental mesenchymal dysplasia (PMD) and those with a mosaic/chimeric GW-UPDpat syndrome. Our objective was to review laboratory data and pregnancy outcome for SNP-based cfDNA screening tests with results compatible with GW-UPDpat and a normal cell line.

methodsThis was a retrospective study of all cfDNA screening results from a single commercial laboratory between June 2014 and November 2023 that were reported as twins or triploidy, with apparent GW-UPDpat. Two-dimensional representations of the relative ratios of SNP alleles (SNP plots) were used to identify and quantify the proportion of cfDNA from the mole ('molar fraction') and that from the coexisting non-molar pregnancy ('fetal fraction'). Test referral and follow-up information, including ultrasound findings, laboratory testing and pregnancy outcome, were reviewed.

resultsOf 5 699 009 tests reviewed, 89 were reported as twins or triploidy, with apparent GW-UPDpat. Retrospective review of SNP plots excluded 12 cases that were reinterpreted as triploidy with an extra set of paternal chromosomes. Of the remaining 77 cases, 24 had follow-up pregnancy information available, and of these, 21 (87.5%) had ultrasound and/or pathology findings that were consistent with CHMCF. The fetal cfDNA fraction was often very low (≤ 2% in 28 cases). The molar cfDNA fraction was in the range of 10-58%. Fetal sex was male in 35 cases, female in 40 cases and uncertain in two cases. No case showed clear evidence of a Y-chromosome in the GW-UPDpat line. All 77 cases had isodisomy; none showed clear evidence of regions of heterodisomy.

conclusionsSNP-based cfDNA screening can help to identify CHMCF and distinguish between CHMCF and triploidy. For CHMCF, early detection is important for evaluating the risk of adverse outcome and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Some of our test-positive cases could have included unrecognized PMD or mosaic/chimeric GW-UPDpat syndrome. These preliminary observations do not allow assessment of the sensitivity or positive predictive value of this test. © 2025 Natera, Inc. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsNoninvasive Prenatal TestingPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrenatal DiagnosisUniparental DisomyAdultFemaleHumansHydatidiform MoleMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesCell-Free Nucleic AcidscfDNA screeningcomplete hydatidiform mole with coexisting fetusgenomic imprinting disordernon‐invasive prenatal testingprenatal detectionSNP plotuniparental disomy

Identifiers

PMID41299888
PMCPMC12757817

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.