Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Anne-Sophie BeaumierDépartement de Psychologie, Faculté des Arts et Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2V 2S9, Canada.
Ana Paula BastosGraduate Course in Linguistics, School of Humanities, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre 90619-900, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8817-4798
Bárbara MalcorraGraduate Course in Linguistics, School of Humanities, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre 90619-900, RS, Brazil.
Bárbara Rusch da RochaPsychology Department, School of Health and Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre 90619-900, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0002-2103-5977
Vanessa BisolPsychology Department, School of Health and Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre 90619-900, RS, Brazil.
Fernanda Souza Espinosa BorgesGraduate Course in Linguistics, School of Humanities, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre 90619-900, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3559-8001
Erica Dos Santos RodriguesDepartment of Letters and Performing Arts, Center for Theology and Human Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro 22451-900, RJ, Brazil.
Maria Teresa Carthery-GoulartCenter for Mathematics, Computing, and Cognition, Federal University of ABC (UFABC), Santo André 09280-560, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2751-4541
Lucas Porcello SchillingBrain Institute of Rio Grande do Sul, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre 90619-900, RS, Brazil.
Karine MarcotteDépartement de Psychologie, Faculté des Arts et Sciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2V 2S9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3275-1154
Lilian Cristine HübnerGraduate Course in Linguistics, School of Humanities, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre 90619-900, RS, Brazil.
Funding
Fonds de recherche du Québec 330547National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 309715/2021-0National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 407022/2021-0
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
Strengthening the Aging Brain: Functional Connectivity Changes After a Language-Based Cognitive Program. · full record | Socratic