Evidence mapPaperPMID 41300224Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2025

Reconnecting Brain Networks After Stroke: A Scoping Review of Conventional, Neuromodulatory, and Feedback-Driven Rehabilitation Approaches.

Jan A Kuipers, Norman H Hoffman, Frederick Robert Carrick, Monèm Jemni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan A KuipersThe Carrick Institute, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-4303-5691
Norman H HoffmanThe Carrick Institute, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0958-5717
Frederick Robert CarrickThe Carrick Institute, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2818-6551
Monèm JemniThe Carrick Institute, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5410-9085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke leads to lasting disability by disrupting the connectivity of functional brain networks. Although several rehabilitation methods are promising, our full understanding of how these strategies restore network function is still limited. Here, we map how non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), brain-computer interface (BCI)/neurofeedback, virtual reality (VR), and robot-assisted therapy restore connectivity within the sensorimotor network (SMN), default mode network (DMN), and salience network, and we contextualize these effects within the known temporal evolution of post-stroke motor network reorganization.

methodsThis scoping review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Medline from January 2015 to January 2025 for clinical trials focused on stroke rehabilitation with functional connectivity outcomes. Included studies used conventional therapy, neuromodulation, or feedback-based interventions.

resultsTwenty-three studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, covering interventions like robotic training, transcranial stimulation (tDCS/TMS), brain-computer interfaces, virtual reality, and cognitive training. Motor impairments were linked to disrupted interhemispheric sensorimotor connectivity, while cognitive issues reflected changes in frontoparietal and default mode networks. Combining neuromodulation with feedback-based methods showed better network recovery than standard therapy alone, with clinical improvements closely associated with connectivity alterations.

conclusionsEffective stroke rehabilitation depends on targeting specific disrupted networks through various modalities. Robotic interventions focus on restoring structural motor pathways, feedback-enhanced methods improve temporal synchronization, and cognitive training aims to enhance higher-order network integration. Future research should work toward standardizing connectivity assessment protocols and conducting multicenter trials. This will help develop evidence-based, network-focused rehabilitation guidelines that effectively translate mechanistic insights into personalized clinical treatments.

Indexed as

brain-computer interfacefunctional connectivitymotor recoveryneuromodulationstroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41300224
PMCPMC12651463

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.