ArticleBiology2025
Integrative Machine Learning Model for Overall Survival Prediction in Breast Cancer Using Clinical and Transcriptomic Data.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, with the Luminal A subtype generally associated with favorable survival. However, age and menopausal status may influence tumor biology and prognosis. To improve prediction beyond conventional models, we analyzed transcriptomic and clinical data from the METABRIC cohort. Patients with Luminal A breast cancer were stratified into premenopausal, postmenopausal-nongeriatric, and geriatric (≥70 years) groups. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, and Boruta feature selection revealed 27 clinical and genomic variables. Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Multilayer Perceptron, and ensemble XGBoost models were trained with stratified 5-fold cross-validation, using SMOTE to correct class imbalance. Principal component analysis showed distinct clustering across age groups, while DEG analysis revealed 41 genes associated with age and survival. Key predictors included clinical variables (age, tumor size, NPI, radiotherapy) and molecular markers (ATM, HERC2, AKT2, FOXO3, CYP3A43). Among ML models, XGBoost demonstrated the highest performance (accuracy 98%, sensitivity 98%, specificity 97%, F1-score 0.99, AUC 0.86), outperforming other algorithms. These findings indicate that age-related transcriptomic changes impact survival in Luminal A breast cancer and that an ML-based integrative approach combining clinical and molecular variables provides superior prognostic accuracy, supporting its potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.