ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Burns in Early Childhood: Age-Specific Causes, Risks, Management, and Implications-A Narrative Review.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes of pediatric burn injuries: A Single Center Study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- The Scalp as a Donor Site in Pediatric Burns: Systematic Review of the Literature and Proposal of a Management Algorithm.European burn journal · 2026Review
- Integrating Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in the Therapeutic Protocol of Extensive Pediatric Burns: Current Practice and Further Treatment Decision Algorithm.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burn injuries represent a significant global burden, with children under the age of five among the most vulnerable groups. This narrative review will explore the main causes of burns in early childhood (under 6 years of age), the associated risks, current treatment approaches, and the long-term implications of these injuries. It will also highlight areas where further research is needed to improve prevention and management strategies for burns in this vulnerable population. Results showed that burns in children under six years old represent a significant clinical and preventive challenge, with physical, psychological, and social implications. Research has identified common causes, particularly scalds from hot liquids, while advancing innovative treatments such as bioengineered skin substitutes, virtual reality, and telemedicine. Preventive interventions at the household and community levels have also proven effective. However, major limitations remain: studies often lack age-specific focus, rely on retrospective data, underrepresent low-resource settings, and lack standardized protocols. To improve outcomes, future research must adopt a more targeted, multidisciplinary approach and address long-term physical and psychological effects to ensure comprehensive, age-appropriate care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.