ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Preterm Birth at Mid-Gestation Using Individual Characteristics and Biophysical Markers: A Cohort Study.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for predicting and preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes addressing bias and clinical translation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPreterm birth (PTB), defined as birth before 37 completed weeks of gestation, is a major global health challenge and a leading cause of neonatal mortality. PTB is broadly classified into spontaneous and medically indicated (iatrogenic), which have distinct etiologies. While prediction is key to improving outcomes, there is a lack of models that specifically differentiate between spontaneous and iatrogenic PTB subtypes. This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models for the prediction of spontaneous and iatrogenic PTB at <32, <34, and <37 weeks' gestation using medical history and readily available second-trimester data.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study on singleton pregnancies from a single tertiary institution (2012-2025). Predictor variables included maternal characteristics, obstetric history, and second-trimester ultrasound markers. Four algorithms, including multivariable Logistic Regression and three machine learning methods (Random Forest, XGBoost, and a Neural Network), were trained and evaluated on a held-out test set (20% of the data). Model performance was primarily assessed by the Area Under the Curve (AUC).
resultsIn total, 9805 singleton pregnancies were included. The models performed significantly better for iatrogenic PTB than for spontaneous PTB. For delivery <37 weeks, the highest AUC for iatrogenic PTB was 0.764 (Random Forest), while for spontaneous PTB it was 0.609 (Neural Network). Predictive accuracy improved for earlier gestations; for delivery <32 weeks, the best model for iatrogenic PTB achieved an AUC of 0.862 (Neural Network), and the best model for spontaneous PTB achieved an AUC of 0.749 (Random Forest). Model interpretation revealed that iatrogenic PTB was primarily driven by markers of placental dysfunction, such as estimated fetal weight by ultrasound scan and uterine artery pulsatility index, while spontaneous PTB was most associated with a history of PTB and a short cervical length.
conclusionsModels using routine mid-gestation data demonstrate effective prediction for iatrogenic PTB, with accuracy improving for earlier, more severe cases. In contrast, performance for spontaneous PTB was modest. Traditional Logistic Regression performed comparably to complex machine learning algorithms, highlighting that the clinical value is rooted in the subtype-specific modeling approach rather than in algorithmic complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.