Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41300750›Full record

ArticleGenes2025

Mitochondrial Base Editing of the m.8993T>G Mutation Restores Bioenergetics and Neural Differentiation in Patient iPSCs.

Luke Yin, Angel Yin, Marjorie Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luke YinCenter of Student Inquiry and Research, Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy, Aurora, IL 60506, USA.
Angel YinWeinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Marjorie JonesDepartment of Chemistry, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61761, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6306-0700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint mutations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) cause a range of neurometabolic disorders that currently have no curative treatments. The m.8993T>G mutation in the

methodsWe engineered a split DddA-derived cytosine base editor (DdCBE), each half fused to programmable TALE DNA-binding domains and a mitochondrial targeting sequence, to correct the m.8993T>G mutation in patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Seven days after plasmid delivery, deep amplicon sequencing showed 35 ± 3% on-target C•G→T•A conversion at position 8993, reducing mutant heteroplasmy from 80 ± 2% to 45 ± 3% with less than 0.5% editing at ten predicted off-target loci.

resultsEdited cells exhibited a 25% increase in basal oxygen consumption rate, a 50% improvement in ATP-linked respiration, and a 2.3-fold restoration of ATP synthase activity. Directed neural differentiation yielded 85 ± 2% Nestin-positive progenitors compared to 60 ± 2% in unedited controls.

conclusionsEdits remained stable over 30 days in culture. These results establish mitochondrial base editing as a precise and durable strategy to ameliorate biochemical and cellular defects in NARP patient cells.

Indexed as

DNA, MitochondrialEnergy MetabolismGene EditingInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMitochondriaMitochondrial Proton-Translocating ATPasesPoint MutationRetinitis PigmentosaCell DifferentiationHumansNeuronsDNA, MitochondrialMitochondrial Proton-Translocating ATPasesMT-ATP6 protein, humanbase editingDdCBEheteroplasmyiPSCsm.8993T>Gmitochondrial DNAMT-ATP6NARP

Identifiers

PMID41300750
PMCPMC12652715

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.