ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multimodality Assessment for Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Implantation.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of advanced heart failure (AdHF) is increasing globally, driven by population aging and improved survival rates in chronic heart failure (CHF). Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support (DMCS), particularly Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs), has become a cornerstone in AdHF management. However, its successful implantation requires a comprehensive preoperative evaluation integrating cardiac, hemodynamic, and systemic assessments. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provide critical data for risk stratification-e.g., LV ejection fraction < 25%, LV end-diastolic diameter < 60 mm, or free wall RV longitudinal strain (fwRVLS) > -14% predict poorer outcomes. Right heart catheterization (RHC) identifies hemodynamic contraindications (PVR > 6 WU, PAPi < 1.5, cardiac index < 2 L/min/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.