ReviewCancers2025
Molecular Insights and Therapeutic Advances in Low-Risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: A Clinical Review.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are characterized by remarkable heterogeneity in clinical manifestations, posing significant management challenges arising due to genetic plasticity. While the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) has traditionally stratified MDS into higher-risk (HR) and lower-risk (LR) categories, the recently developed Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) integrates molecular signatures and has further enhanced prognostic stratification. In LR-MDS, current therapeutic interventions remain non-curative and the goal of treatment is centered along three critical axes: reducing transfusion dependence, improving quality of life, and reducing the risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This review examines recent progress made in the therapeutic landscape of LR-MDS, with particular emphasis on the molecular basis of these novel agents that may have disease-modifying potential. We evaluate the clinical trials and targeted agents in the pipeline for treating LR-MDS, providing a comprehensive perspective where these treatment modalities are placed in the current standard of care and how these novel targets can shape future therapeutic innovations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.