ReviewCancers2025
Prognostic Significance of Endocrine-Related Adverse Events in Patients with Melanoma, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Urothelial Cancer After Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Rise of Oncoendocrinology: How Modern Cancer Therapies Are Reshaping Endocrine Practice.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Pre-treatment endocrine-nutritional signatures predict clinical benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in hematologic malignancies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the management of several malignancies, including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. However, these therapies frequently cause endocrine immune-related adverse events (irAEs), such as thyroid dysfunction, hypophysitis, or autoimmune diabetes, and may carry important prognostic implications. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the incidence, spectrum, and clinical significance of endocrine irAEs across major tumor types.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration (CRD42025646504), we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies reporting endocrine irAEs in ICI-treated patients. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and odds ratios (ORs) for adverse events. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses explored associations by cancer type, ICI class, and event severity.
resultsForty-three studies comprising 17,399 patients were included. Endocrine irAEs occurred in 11-30% of patients and were associated with improved OS (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.54-0.67;
conclusionsThe development of endocrine irAEs coincides with favorable long-term survival outcomes but may represent surrogate markers of immune activation rather than direct predictors of ICI efficacy. However, the lack of consistent ≥ 3-year follow-up across studies warrants cautious interpretation. Routine endocrine monitoring and interdisciplinary management are essential to optimize the safety and effectiveness of immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.