ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Community Benchmark for the Automated Segmentation of Pediatric Neuroblastoma on Multi-Modal MRI: Design and Results of the SPPIN Challenge at MICCAI 2023.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of artificial intelligence in paediatric oncology imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgery plays a key role in treating neuroblastoma. To assist surgical planning, anatomical 3D models derived from the segmentation of anatomical structures on MRI scans are often used. Automation using deep learning can make segmentations less time-consuming and more reliable. We organized the Surgical Planning in PedIatric Neuroblastoma (SPPIN) challenge, to stimulate developments and benchmarking of automatic segmentation of neuroblastoma on MRI. SPPIN is the first segmentation challenge in extracranial pediatric oncology. Nine teams provided a valid submission. Evaluation was based on the Dice similarity coefficient (Dice score), the 95th percentile of the Hausdorff distance (HD95), and the volumetric similarity (VS). A combination of these scores determined the ranking of the teams. The spread in the median evaluation scores per team was large (Dice: 0.21-0.82; HD95: 63.31-7.69; VS: 0.31-0.91). The top-performing team achieved a median Dice score of 0.82 (with an HD95 of 7.69 mm and a VS of 0.91) using a large, pre-trained model. However, in the pre-operative segmentations, significantly lower evaluation scores were observed. Our results indicate that pre-training might be useful in small, pediatric datasets. Although the general results of the winning team were high, they were insufficient to use for surgical planning in small, pre-operative tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.