Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41301113›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Community Benchmark for the Automated Segmentation of Pediatric Neuroblastoma on Multi-Modal MRI: Design and Results of the SPPIN Challenge at MICCAI 2023.

Myrthe A D Buser, Dominique C Simons, Matthijs Fitski, Marc H W A Wijnen, Annemieke S Littooij, Annemiek H Ter Brugge, Iris N Vos, Markus H A Janse, Mathijs de Boer, Rens Ter Maat and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Myrthe A D BuserPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0640-6434
Dominique C SimonsPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-4635-1374
Matthijs FitskiPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0515-7691
Marc H W A WijnenPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Annemieke S LittooijPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Annemiek H Ter BruggePrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Iris N VosImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Markus H A JanseImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0604-1204
Mathijs de BoerImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rens Ter MaatImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Junya SatoDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Shoji KidoDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Satoshi KondoDepartment of Sciences and Informatics, Muroran Institute of Technology, Hokkaido 050-8585, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4941-4920
Satoshi KasaiDepartment of Intelligent Information Engineering, Fujita Health University, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Marek WodzinskiDepartment of Measurement and Electronics, University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8076-6246
Henning MüllerInstitute of Informatics, HES-SO, 3960 Sierre, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6800-9878
Jin YeShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai 200232, China.
Junjun HeShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai 200232, China.
Yannick KirchhoffCancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Maximilian R RokkusCancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-4560-0760
Gao HaokaiSchool of Computer Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Matías Fernández-PatónLa Fe Health Research Institute, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Diana Veiga-CanutoLa Fe Health Research Institute, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
David G EllisUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3718-6836
Michele AizenbergUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6689-8907
Bas H M van der VeldenImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3750-2824
Hugo KuijfImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6997-9059
Alberto de LucaImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alida F W van der SteegPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0168-7513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery plays a key role in treating neuroblastoma. To assist surgical planning, anatomical 3D models derived from the segmentation of anatomical structures on MRI scans are often used. Automation using deep learning can make segmentations less time-consuming and more reliable. We organized the Surgical Planning in PedIatric Neuroblastoma (SPPIN) challenge, to stimulate developments and benchmarking of automatic segmentation of neuroblastoma on MRI. SPPIN is the first segmentation challenge in extracranial pediatric oncology. Nine teams provided a valid submission. Evaluation was based on the Dice similarity coefficient (Dice score), the 95th percentile of the Hausdorff distance (HD95), and the volumetric similarity (VS). A combination of these scores determined the ranking of the teams. The spread in the median evaluation scores per team was large (Dice: 0.21-0.82; HD95: 63.31-7.69; VS: 0.31-0.91). The top-performing team achieved a median Dice score of 0.82 (with an HD95 of 7.69 mm and a VS of 0.91) using a large, pre-trained model. However, in the pre-operative segmentations, significantly lower evaluation scores were observed. Our results indicate that pre-training might be useful in small, pediatric datasets. Although the general results of the winning team were high, they were insufficient to use for surgical planning in small, pre-operative tumors.

Indexed as

3D visualizationchallengeMRIneuroblastomasegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41301113
PMCPMC12649702

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.