Evidence mapPaperPMID 41301134Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Smart Biomaterials in Wound Healing: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions in Intelligent Dressing Design.

Yanlin Liu, Liqin Ge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yanlin LiuState Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Liqin GeState Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wounds (such as diabetic foot ulcers and pressure ulcers) affect millions of patients worldwide. These non-healing wounds pose major clinical challenges due to persistent inflammation, high infection risk, and impaired tissue regeneration, and incur a substantial healthcare burden, with global wound care costs reaching tens of billions of dollars annually. This unmet need has spurred the development of intelligent wound dressings-advanced bioengineered systems that go beyond conventional passive wound coverings by actively monitoring the wound microenvironment and responding dynamically to promote tissue repair. This review comprehensively examines a broad range of smart wound dressing technologies, including pH-sensitive, temperature-responsive, moisture-responsive, pressure-sensing, electroactive, biosensor-integrated, shape-memory, and controlled drug-releasing systems. We also discuss critical challenges in translating these innovations to clinical practice, such as ensuring biocompatibility and long-term stability in the harsh wound environment, manufacturing scalability and cost-effectiveness, patient comfort and adherence, and navigating regulatory hurdles. By emphasizing recent bioengineering advances and clinical potential, we underscore that intelligent wound dressings represent a paradigm shift in chronic wound management-enabling continuous, personalized therapy with the potential to significantly improve healing outcomes, reduce complications, and improve patient quality of life.

Indexed as

biosensorschronic wound healingintelligent wound dressingsstimuli-responsive materials

Identifiers

PMID41301134
PMCPMC12649650

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.