Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41301143›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Immunogenicity and Integration of a Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Scaffold for the Reconstruction of Human Foreskin: A Preclinical Animal Study.

Luca Pennasilico, Margherita Galosi, Lucia Biagini, Valentina Riccio, Caterina Di Bella, Federica Serino, Sara Sassaroli, Felice Ciabocco, Elena Bondioli, Giacomo Rossi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Luca PennasilicoFuturavet, Veterinary Referral Center, 62929 Tolentino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3661-4018
Margherita GalosiSchool of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62024 Matelica, Italy.
Lucia BiaginiSchool of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62024 Matelica, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5990-1514
Valentina RiccioSchool of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62024 Matelica, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4081-2882
Caterina Di BellaDepartment of Translational Medicine and Clinical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Roma, Italy.
Federica SerinoSchool of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62024 Matelica, Italy.
Sara SassaroliSchool of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62024 Matelica, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8712-3446
Felice CiaboccoSchool of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62024 Matelica, Italy.
Elena BondioliEmilia Romagna Regional Skin Bank and Burn Centre Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Romagna, 47522 Cesena, Italy.
Giacomo RossiSchool of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62024 Matelica, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8617-5984
Vincenzo AielloForegen Onlus Association, 00141 Roma, Italy.
Andrea PratesiIndependent Researcher, 35121 Padova, Italy.
Angela Palumbo PiccionelloSchool of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62024 Matelica, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4076-4729

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reconstruction of the foreskin using autografts is a complex procedure. A novel decellularisation method for epithelial tissue has been developed, producing an extracellular matrix scaffold from human donor foreskin. This study evaluated the immune response and integration of this scaffold after implantation in rats, focusing on inflammatory infiltrate, neovascularization, recellularization, and foreign body reaction. Twenty-six rats underwent a 1 cm infrascapular incision with scaffold implantation in the hypodermal layer. Group A (13 rats) was subject to a 30-day follow-up period, while Group B (13 rats) was subject to a 5-day follow-up period. Inflammation at the implantation site was scored from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Tissue explants were. After 5 days (Group B) and 30 days (Group A), a tissue explant was performed and examined histologically and immunohistochemically. The clinical evaluation revealed slight signs of inflammation during the initial five days following the implantation procedure. Neutrophil (0.87 ± 0.35; 1 ± 0.53) and eosinophil (0.61 ± 0.51; 0.75 ± 0.46) presence was slight, with no significant differences between groups. Lymphocyte infiltration was moderate (1.87 ± 0.35; 1.75 ± 0.46), exceeding macrophage presence (1.25 ± 0.46; 1.12 ± 0.35). Neovascularization and cellular colonization were significantly greater at 30 days (2 ± 0.53; 2.42 ± 0.53) compared to 5 days (0.57 ± 0.21; 0.62 ± 0.32). Encapsulation remained mild in all cases, with no intergroup differences (0.87 ± 0.35). These findings indicate that the decellularized extracellular matrix derived from human foreskin elicits minimal immune response while promoting neovascularization and cellular repopulation. This supports its potential use as a biocompatible scaffold in reconstructive procedures.

Indexed as

biocompatibilitydecellularized scaffoldexperimental studyextracellular matrixforeskin dermal matriximmunogenicityregenerative medicinetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41301143
PMCPMC12649637

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.