ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Electrocardiography for Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable Devices and Machine Learning in Cardiovascular Monitoring: Current Evidence and Future Directions for Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in the Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram by Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prediction Pipeline Selection for Incomplete Clinical Data via Missingness Fingerprints and Instance Augmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in early detection and risk prediction of ischemic heart disease.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Nonlinear Feature-Based MI Detection Supported by DWT and EMD on ECG: A High-Performance Decision Support Approach.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Challenges in the Classification of Cardiac Arrhythmias and Ischemia Using End-to-End Deep Learning and the Electrocardiogram: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in neurocardiology: decoding brain-heart network interactions for clinical and translational insights.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are crucial diagnostic tools; however, their traditional interpretations exhibit limited sensitivity and reproducibility. This systematic review discusses the recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including deep learning and machine learning, applied to ECG analysis for CVD detection. It examines over 100 studies from 2019 to 2025, classifying AI applications by disease type (heart failure, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation), model architecture (convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory, and hybrid models), and methodological innovation (signal denoising, synthetic data generation, and explainable AI). Comparative tables and conceptual figures highlight performance metrics, dataset characteristics, and implementation challenges. Our findings indicated that AI models outperform traditional methods, especially in terms of detecting subclinical conditions and enabling real-time monitoring via wearable technologies. Nonetheless, issues such as demographic bias, lack of dataset diversity, and regulatory hurdles persist. The review concludes by offering actionable recommendations to enhance clinical translation, equity, and transparency in AI-ECG applications. These insights aim to guide interdisciplinary efforts toward the safe and effective adoption of AI in cardiovascular diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.