ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparative Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Fibrin, Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft, or Spontaneous Healing for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The potential of eggshell membrane in bone regeneration: a scoping review of applications and advances.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Review
- Sustainable Eggshell-Based Amorphous Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds and Membrane Protein Hydrogel for Regeneration in Rabbit Femoral and Calvarial Defects.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is crucial for maintaining bone and soft-tissue integrity after tooth extraction, thereby facilitating future implant placement. Among various biomaterials, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) are commonly used; however, their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of PRF, FDBA, and spontaneous healing with blood clot in ARP, incorporating recent randomized controlled trials and comparative studies published up to June 2025. Electronic searches were conducted across multiple databases following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed using RoB-2 and ROBINS-I tools. Primary outcomes included changes in alveolar ridge height and width, while secondary outcomes encompassed histological, radiographic, implant-related, and patient-centered measures. Twenty studies were included for qualitative synthesis and sixteen for quantitative analysis. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference between PRF and FDBA in ridge height (SMD = -0.24; 95% CI: -0.56 to 0.08;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.