Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41301292›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Emojis in Marketing and Advertising: A Systematic Literature Review.

Chrysopigi Vardikou, Agisilaos Konidaris, Erato Koustoumpardi, Androniki Kavoura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Emojis in Marketing and Advertising: A Systematic Literature Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chrysopigi VardikouDepartment of Digital Media & Communication, Ionian University, Leof. Antoni Tritsi 1, 28100 Argostoli, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1709-4643
Agisilaos KonidarisDepartment of Digital Media & Communication, Ionian University, Leof. Antoni Tritsi 1, 28100 Argostoli, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0714-0922
Erato KoustoumpardiDepartment of Cultural Heritage Management and New Technologies, University of Patras, University Campus, 26504 Rion, Greece.ORCID 0009-0003-8558-0699
Androniki KavouraDepartment of Business Administration, University of West Attica, 12244 Egaleo, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5940-1998

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies examining emoji applications in digital marketing and advertising are characterized by considerable heterogeneity in their theoretical orientation, methodologies, and contextual factors. A domain-based systematic literature review with the Theory-Context-Characteristics-Methodology (T-C-C-M) framework following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to answer how emojis are researched in marketing, and a bibliometric review was constructed to shed light on important aspects. We found a field growing in volume yet immature, with a diversity of theories and methodologies used to explore the multiple roles of emojis. An analysis of explicit and implicit theories identified that almost a quarter of studies are atheoretical, and the mostly used theories are the Emotions as Social Information Theory (EASI) and the emotional contagion theory. Emojis are mainly researched in social media and in the travel and food industry. The most common methodological categories are experimental designs, with emojis used as independent variables in simple designs. Despite the focus on short-term outcomes (engagement, purchase intention), little attention was given to advertising and to field experiments, constraining ecological validity. Our study reveals the need for a robust theoretical framework that can explain the multiple functions of emojis, and EASI emerged as the leading theory to be tested more extensively.

Indexed as

advertisingcommunicationdigital marketingemojisonline consumer behavioursocial media

Identifiers

PMID41301292
PMCPMC12649122

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.