ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploring Lay Understandings of Romantic Chemistry Using Inductive and Deductive Content Analysis.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Romantic chemistry is an important indicator of compatibility between prospective romantic partners, but, despite theoretical work, lay understandings of romantic chemistry that could inform theory are still unclear. We used an online survey question to collect romantic chemistry conceptualisations from 571 Australian adults who were currently looking for a romantic partner, of whom 53.06% identified with minority gender and/or sexual identities. We analysed responses using inductive content analysis, which resulted in the construction of categories and sub-categories concerning the multifaceted nature of romantic chemistry, the importance of mutual feelings, and central concepts of interactivity, connection, and attraction. We performed a deductive content analysis using these categories and sub-categories to re-code responses and observed little evidence of differences between groups based on assigned sex, gender, sexual, and minority identities. Our findings suggest that romantic chemistry is only perceivable when multiple facets are experienced and that experiences of facets vary individually, which provides ample grounds for future investigation and measurement of romantic chemistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.