Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41301603›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Antimicrobial Peptides Versus Antibiotics in Farm Animal Production.

Boris Gavrilov, Slavena Davidova, Anastasiia Generalova, Alexandra Gergova, Galina Satchanska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Boris GavrilovHuvepharma EOOD, Biologics Development, Nikolay Haytov Str. 3A, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-9063-9200
Slavena DavidovaUPIZ Educational and Research Laboratory of Biology-MF, New Bulgarian University, Montevideo Blvd. 21, 1618 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Anastasiia GeneralovaUPIZ Educational and Research Laboratory of Biology-MF, New Bulgarian University, Montevideo Blvd. 21, 1618 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Alexandra GergovaUPIZ Virology-BF, New Bulgarian University, Montevideo Blvd. 21, 1618 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Galina SatchanskaUPIZ Educational and Research Laboratory of Biology-MF, New Bulgarian University, Montevideo Blvd. 21, 1618 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-5980-4834

Funding

Huvepharma LtD. 225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in livestock pathogens necessitates the development of effective alternatives to conventional antibiotics. This review aims to assess the potential of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as alternatives to traditional antibiotics in farm animal production systems, examining their mechanisms of action, efficacy, and applications. A thorough examination of recent literature was conducted to evaluate the properties, classification, and mechanisms of action of AMPs, their natural occurrence, and their applications in poultry, swine, and ruminant production. The review also compared AMPs with conventional antibiotics, antifungals, and antiparasitic drugs. Specific AMPs have shown effectiveness against livestock pathogens, including

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceantimicrobial mechanismsantimicrobial peptideslivestock productionnano-delivery systemssustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID41301603
PMCPMC12649489

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.