ReviewBiomedicines2025
From Qualitative to Quantitative Functional Assessment in Stroke Rehabilitation with a Focus on Ultrasound Role.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of muscle ultrasound in stroke rehabilitation: a review of calf muscle alterations and clinical implications.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke-surviving patients may present a wide range of neurological deficits affecting both sensory and motor functions as well as the cognitive and the emotional domains, with an impact on independence on daily activities and quality of life in general. Assessment scales are essential tools for evaluating all these aspects of a patient's condition and for monitoring their evolution in time, attempting to provide a quantitative index to complex and sometimes indirectly observable parameters. In fact, the use of these scales entails methodological and interpretative challenges that can limit their applicability and effectiveness. This narrative review explores the current state and limitations of assessment scales used in the rehabilitative evaluation of post-stroke patients. Common neurorehabilitation techniques and traditionally used assessment scales for measuring patient progress are reviewed, highlighting their main limitations. As an alternative to the observational approach, direct assessment of the effect of the ongoing rehabilitative process on the functional recovery of the damaged neurological network, based on the recording of their electric signaling or on the modification in regional cerebral blood flow, have been recently proposed. Innovative rehabilitation assessment methods based on quantitative data are reviewed, with a special focus on ultrasound-based techniques, aiming to improve accuracy and sensitivity in clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.