Incidence of Post-Sedation Emesis in Cynomolgus (

Rachel Coley, Sierra D Palmer, Jennifer Hubbard, Melanie L Graham

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel ColeyResearch Animal Resources, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Sierra D PalmerDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Jennifer HubbardResearch Animal Resources, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Melanie L GrahamDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2475-6975

Funding

This study was partially supported by the Goodale Chair Endowment, which provided key staffing and animal resources under the direction of Principal Investigator Dr. Melanie Graham at the University of Minnesota. N/A

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emesis is one of the most common side effects of ketamine sedation; however, predictors like species and sex have not been studied in macaques. This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of emesis in macaques undergoing ketamine sedation and to assess the efficacy of orally administered antiemetics in preventing emesis. A retrospective analysis was performed using medical records from rhesus and cynomolgus macaques who received ketamine sedation for veterinary examination events from August 2023 to April 2024. Among the 70 sedations performed using IM ketamine, the overall incidence of emesis was 26%. Cynomolgus macaques had a significantly higher risk of emesis (odds ratio (OR) 46.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.08-493.9;

Indexed as

antiemeticcynomolgus macaqueemesismaropitant citrateondansetronrhesus macaquesedation

Identifiers

PMID41302000

DOI10.3390/ani15223292

PMCPMC12649617

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.