Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41302452›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Assessment of Stability and Degradation Kinetics of Carnosic and Rosmarinic Acid in Edible Oil and Its Effectiveness as an Extraction Medium Compared to Other Solvents.

Agnieszka M Hrebień-Filisińska, Sylwia Przybylska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unlocking the Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agnieszka M Hrebień-FilisińskaDepartment of Fish, Plant and Gastronomy Technology, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5778-1544
Sylwia PrzybylskaDepartment of Fish, Plant and Gastronomy Technology, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6706-5798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of edible oil (as an extractant) for the extraction of CA (carnosic acid), C (carnosol), and RA (rosmarinic acid) from sage with popular solvents (methanol, ethanol, 70% methanol, 70% ethanol, and water), as well as to assess the stability and fit the kinetic reaction model to the course of CA and RA degradation in oil macerate and various extracts. The degradation rate constant and half-life of CA and RA were also estimated and compared. CA was most efficiently extracted from sage using ethanol and methanol (9.3-10.1 mg/g of sage), followed by oil (7.10 mg/g). For C and RA, the most suitable solvents were 70% ethanol and 70% methanol (C: 3.08-4.01 mg/g; RA: 19.16-20.24 mg/g). CA was most stable in oil, followed by ethanol > methanol > 70% ethanol > 70% methanol. CA degradation followed a first-order kinetic model. RA was very stable in all extracts, except water, where the kinetics of RA degradation most closely followed a second-order model. Although oil extracts smaller amounts of phytochemicals from sage than solvents, CA in oil was the most stable, and the maceration of sage in oil is safe and consistent with the concept of sustainable development.

Indexed as

AbietanesCinnamatesDepsidesPlant OilsSolventsEthanolKineticsMethanolPlant ExtractsRosmarinic AcidAbietanesCinnamatesDepsidesEthanolMethanolPlant ExtractsPlant OilsRosmarinic AcidsalvinSolventscarnosic acid half-lifedegradation rateecological extractionkinetic modelstability rosmarinic acid

Identifiers

PMID41302452
PMCPMC12655447

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.