ArticleMicromachines2025
Effect of Geometric Design on the Mechanical Performance of Digital Light Processing (DLP)-Printed Microneedles.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aerosol Jet Printing in Biotechnologies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study describes the processing of microneedle (MN) arrays with three different heights of arrowhead (600 µm (A1), 800 µm (A2), and 1000 µm (A3)), pyramid (600 µm (P1), 800 µm (P2), and 1000 µm (P3)), and turret (600 µm (T1), 800 µm (T2), and 1000 µm (T3)) designs using a digital light processing (DLP)-based 3D printing method. The 3D-printed MNs were examined for their morphological characteristics and mechanical performance. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging confirmed that all of the MNs were fabricated without fracture or bending. Each design exhibited distinct structural characteristics: arrowhead MNs displayed a well-defined morphology with sharp tips, pyramid MNs showed slight layering, and turret MNs, characterized by a wider base and sharp tips, had a smoother surface compared to the other designs. Mechanical tests revealed that the arrowhead MNs carried less load and were more prone to bending, while the pyramid and turret designs provided higher mechanical stability and penetration capacity. The pyramid design (P3) showed the highest mechanical strength, while turret MNs offered a more stable performance despite lower penetration capacity. These findings highlight the critical role of geometric design in optimizing MN performance for effective transdermal drug delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.