Evidence mapPaperPMID 41303049Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Device-Based Therapies for Refractory Angina.

Andrea Caffè, Rocco A Montone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrea CaffèDepartment of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5264-1043
Rocco A MontoneDepartment of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6439-1018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantial proportion of patients with ischemic heart disease continue to experience recurrent or persistent angina despite optimized medical therapy and prior revascularization, highlighting the need for novel and effective treatment strategies. Device-based therapies have emerged as promising options to address this unmet clinical need. Among these, the Coronary Sinus Reducer™ (CSR) has gained particular attention, supported by randomized trials and registries demonstrating improvements in angina symptoms and quality of life, with a favorable safety profile. However, a disconnect between symptomatic relief and objective measures of myocardial perfusion has been noted, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Beyond the CSR, other device-based approaches-such as enhanced external counterpulsation, neuromodulation, and shockwave therapy-are either approved or under investigation. This review explores the current landscape of device-based therapies for angina, focusing on the evidence supporting the CSR and other device-based interventions. We discuss pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and future research directions aimed at optimizing therapeutic efficacy. Integrating patient-reported outcomes with physiological and imaging assessments will be essential to refine indications and improve long-term results. Device-based therapies represent a developing frontier in angina management, with the potential to improve outcomes in patients with persistent symptoms despite optimal medical and interventional therapy.

Indexed as

chronic coronary syndromesCoronary Sinus Reducerdevice-based therapyenhanced external counter-pulsationextracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularizationischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA)myocardial perfusion imagingrefractory anginaspinal cord stimulationstable angina

Identifiers

PMID41303049
PMCPMC12653967

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.