ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Modern Technologies Supporting Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of vibration therapy on physical function, activity and participation in people with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- FDA-Listed Interactive Devices for Home Movement Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Mixed-Methods Study of Availability, User Needs, Information Gaps, and an Accompanying Dataset.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Temporal neural coupling: reconciling the Bobath concept with task-oriented training for post-stroke upper limb recovery-a perspective.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Most Effective Interventions for Improving Upper Extremity Function in Patients with Hemiparesis.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Robotic rehabilitation with the LokomatFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.